Sigma 85mm F14 Dg Hsm Art Vs Nikon 105 14
Sigma has been challenging the contest with its Global vision line-up. The combination of "no compromise" image quality and fair toll is exhibiting quite a flake of pressure on such brands as Canon and Nikon. And the recent launch of Sony Due east mount lenses will surely disturb Sony's glass business equally well (might simultaneously drive Sony'southward mirrorless business by providing true third political party lens support). In 2013, I bought my first Sigma 35mm f/1.four Art prime and till this twenty-four hours, it never leaves my camera handbag. Since then, I have added Sigma's 85mm f/ane.4 and 135mm f/1.8 Art lenses to my arsenal.
This Saturday, I was eagerly waiting for the postman to deliver my newest toy, the Sigma 105mm f/one.4 Art. Effectually noon, I heard a knock on the door and it was the UPS guy with my package from Adorama. Equally soon as I opened the box, I knew this was no TOY – the lens means business!
First, allow's become it out of the mode – the Sigma 105mm f/1.iv Art should be nicknamed Bokeh "Monster" instead of "Bokeh Master". This lens is huge – non quite as enormous as the Nikon 200 f/2 just it is however big and heavy. If you use this lens in the field, yous might have people come upwards and ask about information technology (yep, information technology happened every bit soon every bit I took it out for test shots).
Let'south go through the (not so ho-hum) specs. I will be comparing Sigma'southward three prime lenses which are in the mid to brusk telephoto range. They are best used for portraits, which is what I use them for, but yous tin can obviously shoot whatever you would like.
| Description | 85mm f/1.four Art | 105mm f/1.4 Art | 135mm f/1.8 Art |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lens Construction | xiv Elements in 12 Groups | 17 Elements in 12 Groups | 13 Elements in ten Groups |
| Maximum Aperture | f/ane.4 | f/1.4 | f/one.viii |
| Minimum Discontinuity | f/16 | f/16 | f/16 |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 85cm / 33.5″ | 100cm / 39.4″ | 87.5cm / 34.four″ |
| Filter Size | 86mm | 105mm | 82mm |
| Weight | i,130g / 39.9oz | ane,645g / 58oz | one,130g / 39.9oz |
| Toll | $1,199 | $ane,599 | $1,399 |
By now, I have had some time shooting with all 3 lenses and I can say this from experience – you volition Not be shooting all-day weddings with 105mm f/1.four Art unless y'all spend a few hours every twenty-four hours at the gym (I don't). I will be using this lens for my 1–ii hour portrait and pre-hymeneals / date sessions (and whenever I experience like working out).
If yous are thinking of buying any 1 of these lenses, you can not get wrong with any of them. Every bit nosotros have size and weight out of our way, I can think of three other factors that can help you make up one's mind: Price, Aperture, and Focal length.
Toll: The cheapest of the bunch is the Sigma 85mm f/1.4 Art – almost $400 (25%) cheaper than the nigh expensive lens in our listing. If the price is your concern, become with the 85mm and you will be happy. Ownership the 105mm f/i.4 Art might non give you lot 25% better images. Comparison the Sigma prices to Canon and Nikon equivalent lenses, you tin clearly run across that Sigma volition definitely give you improve bang for your cadet (Nikon 105 f/i.4 retails for $2,196.95). Some people might exist worried about the value depreciation of 3rd party glass. Just balance assured that my 5+ year erstwhile Sigma 35 f/1.4 withal sells for $550–650 used on eBay )and I paid $799 for it make new).
Aperture: I am not going to talk numbers and get all technical here – 135mm is f/1.8 vs 85 and 105 both having f/1.four aperture. All three lenses permit in lots of calorie-free and volition give you lot creamy bokeh.
Let's now check out some sample images.
Notation: All images are shot with the Nikon D850 in RAW format and and so converted to JPEG with minimal correction for exposure and exported with 'camera portrait' profile in Adobe Lightroom 7.iv.
Blind Exam: Before reading the description which image y'all like the best?
From left to right we accept: Sigma 85mm f/1.iv, 105mm f/1.4 and 135mm f/ane.eight Art.
In all three shots, I tried to continue the exact same frame by changing my position from the model. No lens correction was applied. Yous can conspicuously see how each focal length and aperture affect the background and distort the subject.
Let's have a wait at another instance:
Again, the sequence from left to right is: Sigma 85mm f/i.4, 105mm f/1.4 and 135mm f/ane.viii Art.
Focal Length: Irresolute focal length can have a dramatic effect on your pictures. In our case, all three lenses are nether brusk to medium telephoto range which is best suited for portraiture. As you can see in the starting time image samples, changing focal length from curt (85mm) to long (135mm) makes the subject field look slightly thinner or less distorted in the middle of the frame. This can be somewhat corrected with lens profiles in Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop. As of now, there is no lens contour bachelor for the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Fine art, simply information technology is just a matter of time – information technology will probably be updated shortly. In the meantime, you can create your own lens profiles or experiment with the correction sliders.
Another aspect of the image which will be afflicted by the focal length is the size of the background relative to the discipline. As you can see from the above comparison, in the first image (135mm), the background appears larger compared to the last image (85mm), where we can see a lot more of the background elements.
The last outcome of the focal length is reach. Zoom lenses have their place in my drove. Most of the weddings and events I shot with my Nikon 24–70mm f/2.8, which covers all the "run and gun" situations. Only I always deport a prime lens on my second trunk or have the second shooter with a tally prime lens. For almost a yr, I accept been using either 85mm or 135mm on my 2d body, but it looks similar the 105mm will fill that perfect middle position for me.
Here are some sample images where the subject and camera locations are static, and the only variable is the lens:
From left to correct: Sigma 85mm f/1.4, 105mm f/ane.4 and 135mm f/i.viii Art.
Prototype Quality: All three lenses are super abrupt with minimum vignetting and negligible chromatic aberration. If I had a gun to my head and I had to cull strictly based on Image Quality, the Sigma 105mm would be my elevation choice due to its amazing sharpness, least chromatic aberration and the least corporeality of vignetting thanks to its optical pattern comprised of a total of 17 elements and a huge (and I mean HUUUGE) forepart chemical element.
Summary
From my initial impression based on using the lens in the field, I tin say with confidence that Sigma has a winner in their hand. If you are in the market for a portrait telephoto lens and don't listen spending $1,600 on a lens, look no further – the Sigma 105mm f/one.four Art is a stunner.
Which photos do y'all like in the blind examination? Delight let me know in the comments section below. Happy clicking!
Source: https://photographylife.com/sigma-85mm-f1-4-vs-105-f1-4-vs-135-f1-8-art-comparison
0 Response to "Sigma 85mm F14 Dg Hsm Art Vs Nikon 105 14"
Post a Comment